Published: 15 December 2022    Last Updated: 16 December 2022

A couple of years ago I wrote an article about hashcracking with Hashcat and AWS; but that was back on Ubuntu 16.04 and it involved manually compiling the packages. So I thought I’d best update it for Ubuntu 22.04 and why not use the Nvidia ubuntu repos to make things easier too.

Published: 01 December 2022    Last Updated: 05 July 2023

First of all, what is username enumeration? It is when a web application has a feature that allows a user to supply a username and the application will disclose (not necessarily intentionally) if the username is valid or not. This is closely related to Username Disclosure, except in the latter the application is including valid usernames in server responses in some way, which allows a threat actor to determine a username is valid without having to specify it first themselves. Both of these are an issue and both should be addressed.

Published: 27 October 2022    Last Updated: 03 November 2022

Sweet32 describes a birthday attack on 64-bit block ciphers. This attack has been demonstrated against both 3DES and Blowfish, against both VPNs as well as HTTPS traffic. This attack allows an attacker who can perform an interception attack to decrypt small amounts of ciphertext, such as session tokens and other sensitive cookie values.

Published: 25 October 2022    Last Updated: 03 November 2022

Padding Oracle On Downgraded Legacy Encryption (POODLE) is an attack against SSLv3.0. It exploits two aspects of SSLv3.0. The first aspect involves an attacker performing an interception attack and modify network traffic between a client and server, downgrading the connection to SSLv3.0. The second aspect is a padding oracle issue with block ciphers in cipher-block chaining mode in SSLv3.0 which allows an attacker to decrypt small amounts of ciphertext within messages, such as session tokens and confidential cookie values.

Published: 25 October 2022    Last Updated: 03 November 2022

The use of Cipher Block Chaining (CBC) mode ciphers is “discouraged”. This term is used as these cipher suites have not been formally deprecated but have effectively been superseded. For example, later version of Transport Layer Security support more secure cipher mode options such as Galois/Counter Mode (GCM) ciphers. Additionally, CBC-mode ciphers have had a series of vulnerabilities such as Lucky13, Zombie POODLE, GOLDENDOODLE, 0-Length OpenSSL, and Sleeping POODLE.

Published: 25 October 2022    Last Updated: 05 July 2023

Lucky 13 is a padding oracle vulnerability against CBC-mode ciphers in TLS that utilises a timing side-channel. This issue is due to a flaw within the SSL/TLS specification and is not implementation specific, however implementations may be able to harden against exploitation of this issue and prevent exploitation by removing the timing side-channel.

Published: 21 October 2022    Last Updated: 05 July 2023

BEAST is an attack that exploits several weaknesses within Transport Layer Security (TLS) 1.0 and older SSL protocols when using a CBC-mode cipher. The flaw is not strictly within the Transport Layer Security protocol itself, but is instead a known issue with Cipher Block Chaining (CBC).

Published: 21 October 2022    Last Updated: 03 November 2022

Compression Ration Info-leak Made Easy (CRIME) is a vulnerability in the compression used in Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and Transport Layer Security (TLS). It also affects Google’s HTTP-like protocol SPDY. It requires an attacker to perform an interception attack but if successful could allow for the decryption of session tokens and other sensitive cookie values. The attack was demonstrated as practical in 2012.

Published: 21 October 2022    Last Updated: 05 July 2023

Decrypting RSA with Obsolete and Weakened Encryption (DROWN) is a vulnerability in servers that support Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) version 2.0. It is a form of cross-platform Bleichenbacher padding oracle attack and would allow a threat actor that is able to perform an interception attack to decrypt intercepted TLS connections by making specially crafted connections to an SSLv2 server that uses the same private key.

Published: 21 October 2022    Last Updated: 03 November 2022

Look, there's a whole bunch of vulnerabilities in Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and Transport Layer Security (TLS) and it can be difficult to keep up with them all, even if they have fancy names and logos! So here's a quick summary of each for you.

Published: 21 October 2022    Last Updated: 05 July 2023

Return of Bleichenbacher’s Oracle Threat (ROBOT) is a padding oracle vulnerability that allows a threat actor to illegitimately perform RSA decryption and signing operations with the private key of a TLS server. The attack would allow an attacker to intercept communications and later decrypt them.

Published: 21 October 2022    Last Updated: 03 November 2022

Browser Reconnaissance & Exfiltration via Adaptive Compression of Hypertext (BREACH) is a vulnerability similar in nature to CRIME, but where CRIME affected TLS/SPDY compression, BREACH affects HTTP compression. Where an application supports HTTP compression, reflects user-input within response bodies, and includes confidential information in that body – such as a CRSF token, it may be affected by BREACH. This attack was demonstrated as practical in 2013.

Published: 21 October 2022    Last Updated: 03 November 2022

An attack against RC4 was demonstrated in 2015. This attack affects the use of RC4 in several protocols, including within Transport Layer Security (TLS) used by web browsers and web applications but also within WPA-TKIP used by wireless networks. This weakness in RC4 when applied to TLS can allow an attacker to decrypt a small amount of repeated content, such as a session token or other sensitive cookie values.

Published: 21 October 2022    Last Updated: 05 July 2023

Factoring RSA Export Keys (FREAK) is an attack against “export ciphers suites” which are cipher suites that have intentionally limited security due to prior regulation within the United States. This regulation placed restrictions on the strength of encryption algorithms used in software for exportation. This attack was demonstrated in 2015 and can allow a threat actor who is able to perform an interception attack against HTTPS traffic to decrypt message contents.

Published: 21 February 2022    Last Updated: 03 July 2023

The X-Frame-Options header can be used to specify whether a web browser should be allowed to render the target page in a frame (such as a frame, iframe, embed, or an object tag). This can be used to prevent attacks such as ClickJacking.

Published: 21 February 2022    Last Updated: 03 July 2023

The Cache-Control HTTP server response header specifies whether the server response can be cached by the web browser and any interim devices such as web proxies. Generally, if the content of the page includes confidential information, then it should not be cached, as if confidential information is cached on user's device, and that device is a public device, or shared with other users then the information may be compromised by another user with access to the device.

Published: 22 August 2021    Last Updated: 03 July 2023

Penetration Testing, often abbreviated to PenTesting, is a method of testing the security of a system through attempting to discover and actively exploit vulnerabilities within the system. It is amongst the most effective methods of determining the actual risk posed by a system. This is due to the fact that the risk of present vulnerabilities is not estimated but they are exploited to determine how much leverage they would offer an attacker.

Published: 06 August 2021    Last Updated: 03 July 2023

Same-Origin Policy (SOP) is a critical part of the security implemented within a web browser. It’s the part of your browser’s security system that prevents malicious pages from reading confidential information from other sites. So thepiratebay.com can’t read data from barclays.com because it’s blocked by SOP.

The way that it works simply, is that pages of different origins can send requests to other domains, but not process their responses. Certain items aren’t covered by SOP, such as images and scripts – this is because these are considered assets to be used within an application and not considered to affect the security of that application.

Published: 06 August 2021    Last Updated: 03 July 2023

Got a path/directory traversal or file disclosure vulnerability on a Linux-server and need to know some interesting files to hunt for? I’ve got you covered Know any more good files to look for? Let me know!

The list included below contains absolute file paths, remember if you have a traversal attack you can prefix these with encoding traversal strings, like these:

Published: 06 August 2021    Last Updated: 03 July 2023

Got a path/directory traversal or file disclosure vulnerability on a Windows-server and need to know some interesting files to hunt for? I’ve got you covered Know any more good files to look for? Let me know!

The list included below contains absolute file paths, remember if you have a traversal attack you can prefix these with encoding traversal strings, like these:

Published: 06 August 2021    Last Updated: 05 July 2023

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) enforces the use of HTTPS in the web browser, ensuring that no information is sent to the domain (and optionally subdomains too), even if the user attempts to navigate to a HTTP page. This additionally mitigates the risk of cookies without the "secure" flag set, by enforcing all traffic is HTTPS only.

Published: 06 August 2021    Last Updated: 05 July 2023

Often abbreviated to CSRF and often pronounced as “Sea-Surf” is an attack against a Web Application that abuses an application’s trust in the user. A threat actor’s aim is to cause a function to execute on the application using the user’s authentication credentials simply by causing the user’s browser to request that function in the normal way, but from a malicious site.

For example, a user navigates to a malicious site and this site in turn sends a request to the vulnerable function on the vulnerable web site. This is where “Cross-site” comes from, it is a malicious site sending a request to the vulnerable site.

Published: 06 August 2021    Last Updated: 03 July 2023

In my experience Insecure Direct Object Reference is one of the least well known vulnerabilities out there, but it’s a very simply issue to explain. It’s a vulnerability that generally leads to loss of confidential data but can result in the less of modification of data too.

Published: 06 August 2021    Last Updated: 03 July 2023

Effectively filtering user input is one of the best ways to prevent an awful lot of web application vulnerabilities. There are several ways to approach this, each with their own pros and cons so I’ll run through them here an then you can think of the best way to combine them for your context. It’s important to remember though, that filters are context specific, there is not one filter that will work for a whole application and that’s what can make writing an effective filter tricky.

Published: 06 August 2021    Last Updated: 05 July 2023

HTTP Header Injection vulnerabilities occur when user input is insecurely included within server responses headers. Specifically they are based around the idea that a threat actor can cause the server to generate a response which includes carriage-return and line-feed characters (or %0D and %0A respectively in their URI encoded forms) within the server response header the attacker may be able to add crafted headers themselves. Header Injection can allow for attacks such as response splitting, session fixation, cross-site scripting, and malicious redirection.

Published: 06 August 2021    Last Updated: 03 July 2023

HTML5 PostMessages (also known as: Web Messaging, or Cross Domain Messaging) is a method of passing arbitrary data between domains. However if not implemented correctly it can lead to sensitive information disclosure or cross-site scripting vulnerabilities as it leaves origin validation up to the developer!

Published: 06 August 2021    Last Updated: 05 July 2023

So by default SOP won’t allow bi-directional communications between two separate origins, however as applications scale up there may be a requirement to allow this kind of thing. Think of companies such as Google, who also owns YouTube – or Microsoft who also owns Outlook and Skype. They may well want inter-origin communications.

Published: 07 June 2021    Last Updated: 05 July 2023

Command Injection vulnerabilities occur where user supplied input is insecurely included within an operating system command, allowing a threat actor to execute additional commands or alter the syntax of the executed command. This vulnerability typically allows for confidential data theft and may allow a threat actor to target internal network connections for further attacks.

Published: 07 June 2021    Last Updated: 03 July 2023

We've previously written about many different techniques for Finding and Exploiting SQL Injection vulnerabilities. However, there are often restrictions and interim technologies such as Web Application Firewalls that can prevent certain payloads from being used. In some instances filters can be bypassed through common encoding mechanisms, however often these will be ineffective and other methods much be used.

Published: 07 June 2021    Last Updated: 03 July 2023

We've previously posted about manually finding and exploiting SQL injection vulnerabilities. However one of the reasons SQL Injection is such a high risk vulnerability overall if due to the fact that exploitation can often be entirely automated. One tool for exploiting this vulnerability is sqlmap. From the point of view of security testers, SQL Injection can be time consuming to exploit, especially with slow extraction methods such as Time-based blind. However by automating exploitation can allow security testers to demonstrate the issue risk whilst freeing up time to check other areas of the assessment scope.

Published: 07 June 2021    Last Updated: 05 July 2023

Path Traversal, also known as Directory Traversal, is a vulnerability where a user can alter a path used by an application. For file retrieval functionality this can allow an attacker to access files that are not intentionally disclosed. For file upload functionality this can allow for website defacement, code execution and stored cross-site scripting attacks.

Published: 31 May 2021    Last Updated: 03 July 2023

Hosting web application content such as dynamic scripts and stylesheets on third parties such as Content Delivery Networks (CDNs) can allow for significant improvements to site performance and can reduce bandwidth costs. However, scripts included within a web application will execute within the user's browser with the same privileges as the currently logged in user. Therefore if a script is included from an external domain, that domain is trusted with the confidentiality and integrity of data stored within the application.

Published: 26 January 2021    Last Updated: 03 July 2023

Out-of-band exploitation refers to exploits where the extracted information is received over a connection other than the one the payload was delivered over. It can be used to bypass defensive technologies as well as complicating the detection and response capability. SQL Injection can be exploited out-of-band through protocols such as DNS in order to extract database contents. This is particularly useful as an alternative to Time-based exploitation where it can allow for faster extraction. If you're new to this vulnerability, it's worth starting at SQL Injection basics first, before reading this article.

The idea behind out-of-band exploitation is fairly simple, instead of inferring content in the database through something like Boolean logic, you can request the target system transmit the information over protocols such as HTTP, SMB or DNS.

Published: 22 January 2021    Last Updated: 03 July 2023

SQL Injection is a vulnerability that occurs where user supplied input is insecurely concatenated into an SQL query. We showed how easy can be to detect in our Finding SQL Injection article, and we’ve run through exploitation in many posts such as our post on Exploiting Error-based SQL Injection.

However, in this post, we’re looking at fixing it. The fix is quite a simple code change. As the issue described is user input insecurely concatenated into a query, the remediation for SQL injection is fairly simple: don’t build queries through string concatenation. Instead, it’s more secure to use “Prepared Statements”, often called “Parameterized Queries”. All modern languages support this type of query either directly or through a framework; here we will supply a PHP example to show the difference.

Published: 25 October 2020    Last Updated: 03 July 2023

This issue comes about where user supplied input is included within server responses without filtration or encoding.

One very effective method of preventing this attack is to use an allow-list (sometimes called a whitelist) which will allow only known good content. For example, if your expected input is an integer and the user supplies anything other than an integer you can simply reject that input – and perhaps supply a message to inform the user what the issue is, without including the original payload.

Published: 25 October 2020    Last Updated: 03 July 2023

Whilst Reflected and Stored XSS can generally be addressed through server-side user input encoding (such as through the PHP htmlentities() function) or with browser protections such as Content-Security-Policy – this is not sufficient for DOM-XSS.

Where a dangerous function is used, user input into that function should be limited through user input filtering. An allow-list approach of restricting user input to only known-good input should be used. For example, limiting input to the smallest number of characters possible (such as alphanumerics only) and checking the expected data type (such as limiting input to integers only). This is in contrast to a block-list of known-bad inputs being blocked, which is often less effective due to the large degree of flexibility that JavaScript allows. For a good example of this flexibility, consider something like JScrewIt.

Published: 19 October 2020    Last Updated: 03 July 2023

Content Security Policy (CSP) allows the application to restrict the location of resources to an allow-list of approved locations, including where scripts can be loaded from and when the application may be framed. This can therefore mitigate reflected and stored cross-site scripting attacks as well as issues such as Clickjacking.

Published: 19 October 2020    Last Updated: 03 July 2023

XML Entity Injection is a powerful vulnerability that can allow for confidential data theft and in rare cases command execution. It was also often overlooked for a while - but now it features in the OWASP Top 10 as A4 it's a lot more well known. The issue comes about within XML parsers where external entities are processed which can allow for URIs to be loaded.

Wait, back up. What's an entity? An easy way to think of entities is like a variable. It can hold strings, so an entity can be used in XML to hold text content - or it can be used with a URI to load remote content.

Published: 19 October 2020    Last Updated: 03 July 2023

Breaking into Penetration Testing can be a daunting career move; so in this article we talked about ways you can make your first move towards a career in this industry. To be clear, this isn't a definitive guide to the industry - it's just our opinion on what has worked for our team and what we like to look for when hiring. So, when interviewing for a position as a junior penetration tester - what makes you stand out from the crowd?

Whilst it's certainly useful to know how to use common security testing tools, it's better if you can understand what's going on under the hood. It's also just as important to know how to remediate the issues found. For example, knowing which flags to use when executing Responder is good; but it's better if you can talk about the underlying protocols such as Link Local Multicast Name Resolution and why it can lead to significant vulnerabilities.

Published: 19 October 2020    Last Updated: 05 July 2023

SQL Injection is an old vulnerability; first published on Christmas Day 1998 in Phrack Magazine 54. The issue occurs where user supplied input is insecurely concatenated into an SQL query. It generally allows a threat actor to perform any of the operations that the database user can execute – such as extracting, changing, or deleting database contents. Rarely, where the database user is highly privileged, this can allow for command execution through features such as the MSSQL xp_cmdshell system stored procedure.

Exploiting the issue manually is often trivial, but there are freely available public exploitation tools available – such as SQLmap.

Published: 19 October 2020    Last Updated: 03 July 2023

With error-based injection, data can be extracted from the database where an error message can be crafted which contains confidential data. For example:

MySQL: AND ExtractValue('',Concat('=',@@version))
MSSQL: AND 1 in (@@version)

With the MSSQL payload above the intention is to cause a string to be converted to an integer – which may throw an error where the error will contain the contents of the string. With the MySQL payload above a similar thing is attempted however this is achieved through an XPath function.

Published: 19 October 2020    Last Updated: 03 July 2023

UNION SELECT statements can be used for retrieving the results of a second SELECT statement by appending it to the end of another query. This is useful for SQL injection as it allows you to append a query to the end of a query executed by a developer to retrieve arbitrary database contents. It’s important to note that the details of the second query must match the first, specifically they must have the same number of columns and those columns must match in type.

Therefore the first step to exploiting SQL injection through UNION injection is to determine how many columns there are in the original query. This is possible in two main ways – either by creating a select statement and increasing the column count until the query executes or alternatively using “ORDER BY” syntax and increasing the column count until an error occurs – which implies that the number which causes an error is higher than the number of columns in use.

Published: 19 October 2020    Last Updated: 03 July 2023

We’ve previously written about Reflected and Stored Cross-site Scripting, however this time we want to tackle DOM-Based Cross-site Scripting, or DOM-XSS for short. The exploitation of DOM-XSS is frequently very similar to Reflected Cross-site scripting, were the payload is stored within the URL and exploitation occurs where a user can be tricked into clicking the link, such as through a phishing email – but we’ll break it down step by step.

Cross-site Scripting vulnerabilities occur where scripts can be executed within another user’s view of a web application. It can allow for attacks such as virtual defacement of the page, the theft of confidential data, or the distribution of malicious software to users of the site.

Published: 19 October 2020    Last Updated: 05 July 2023

Cross-site Scripting (XSS) issues occur where user supplied input is insecurely included within a server response, or insecurely processed by a client-side script. If the payload is included with the response that immediately follows the request containing the payload then this is known as Reflected XSS. It is also sometimes referred to as Non-persisted XSS. If the payload is stored by the server and returned in a later response, it is known as Stored XSS, or Persistent XSS. Where the issue is due to insecure client-side processing it is known as DOM-Based XSS. Finding and exploiting DOM-Based XSS is quite different to stored or reflected, so we’ve separated it into its own article: Finding DOM-XSS.

Published: 19 October 2020    Last Updated: 03 July 2023

In terms of crafting payloads, Time-based injection is very similar to Blind-Boolean injection. That is to say that extracting data from the database is generally done one character at a time. Time-based exploitation uses a function which causes a temporary pause in the database response; these differ depending on the database type.

This can then be used within an IF statement to execute Boolean statements against the database.

Published: 19 October 2020    Last Updated: 05 July 2023

Blind injection refers to exploit where the output of the payload is not directly displayed within application output, but the threat actor is able to infer what the output was. This is possible with SQL injection and essentially involves asking the database a series of true/false (Boolean) questions to determine database content. A simple true/false can be something like:

AND 1=1
AND 1=2

If the difference between a true statement and a false statement is visible within the application response, then Boolean exploitation is possible. To enable this, Boolean statements need to be crafted which allow the attacker to infer what the database content is.